Don't sit back quietly and let the Bush Administration violate your rights to privacy guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the United States! Call, write,or e-mail your congressmen and Senators today. Tell them to stop the Bush Administration's violation of the Constitution and wiretapping laws. They will listen if enough people take the time to protest this unlawfulness. Never give up and never give in! "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety."---Benjamin Franklin
This Month
April 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
Welcome to the Elizabethtown, Ky News, eminating from the Heartland of Kentucky. Here you will find unvarnished views on local, state,and national issues. Your comments are welcome. Thanks for visiting and come back often.
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
 Photos
 Iraq
 Iran
 Fear
 9/11
 Humor
 Taxes
View Article  Does Bush's Concern For "Life" Include Iraqis?

Elizabethtown, KY--April 16, 2007

In March, 2003 President George W. Bush invaded Iraq under false premises, after lying to the world and our nation.

Since then over 650,000 Iraqis have been killed in Iraq with many hundreds more dying every month. Over two million Iraqis have fled Iraq out of fear for their lives, and over one million more have moved from their homes to other locations in Iraq for the same reason.

So, the question is:  When George Bush talks about a "culture of life", is that only about American lives, or about human life in general?

View Article  Nuclear Rules and Iran

Elizabethtown, KY--April 10, 2007

The policy of the nuclear powers towards Iran vis-a-vis the nuclear issue is a good example of their attempt to control the world with that power.

Why can't Iran have nuclear power plants?  The U.S. does, as do some other countries of the world.

Why can't Iran have nuclear weapons if they so choose?  The U.S. does. Israel does.  France does.  Britain does.  Russia does. China does, as does its proxy North Korea. Pakistan does, with our approval. George Bush just gave India his nuclear blessing.

Iran--including Grand Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Kamenei and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad--must renounce previous statements by Ahmadinejad that Israel must be "wiped off the face of the earth."  Iran should formally recognize Israel's right to exist peacefully.  Further, Iran must allow full and unfettered U.N. and IAEA inspections of their nuclear facilities and programs.

With that sincerely done, then why should any country--including Iran or any other country--be told they can or can not have nuclear power or nuclear weapons by those who have them?

The answer is: those who have them want to maintain the military advantage and the dominance it gives them over those who do not.

 

View Article  Earth Burns While U.S and China Fiddle

Elizabethtown, KY--February 5, 2006

In the year 64 A.D., ten of the fourteen Augustan regions of Rome burned while--as popular legend has it-- Roman Emperor Nero fiddled.

Today the United States, China and other nations fiddle while the Earth faces the prospect of runaway global warming.

 Forty-six nations agreed to support the report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).  But not the largest contributors to global warming--the United States, China, Russia, and India.

These large countries burn enormous amounts of fossil fuel.  The burning of fossil fuels creates greenhouse gases that trap the heat of the sun, instead of the sun's heat being reflected back to space, as would normally happen.

What  are the consequences of trapping the sun's heat instead of  reflecting it back to space? According to an analysis of the IPCC report by (Phillipine newspaper) Inquirer editorial consultant Amando Doronila, they include "melting ice sheets, rising sea levels, heat waves, worsening droughts, heavy rainfall in some regions, and stronger hurricanes and storms."

Doronila listed the "Highlights of the Report" as follows:

* "Global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, [which] have increased markedly as a result of human activity, exceed pre-industrial values."

*The global increases in carbon dioxide concentration "are due primarily to fossil fuel (mainly oil, coal, and gas) and land-use change."

*"Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observation of increases in global average and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising mean sea level."

*Eleven of the last 12 years (1996-2006) rank among the 12 warmest years in the record of global surface temperature (since 1850).

*The Earth's surface temperatures were predicted to rise between 1.8 and 4.0 Celsius and sea levels by 7.1 inches to 23.3 inches by 2100.

*Numerous long-term climate changes have been observed at continental, regional and ocean basin scales.

*Significantly increased precipitation has been observed in eastern parts of North and South America,  northern Europe and northern central Asia.  Drying has been observed in the Sahel, the Mediterranean, southern Africa and parts of southern Asia.

*More intense and longer droughts have been observed over wider areas since 1970, particularly in  the tropics (where the Philippines is located) and sub-tropics.  Increased drying linked with higher temperatures and decreased precipitation have contributed to changes in droughts.

*Widespread changes in extreme temperatures have been observed over the past 50 years.  Cold days, cold nights and frost have become less frequent, while hot days, hot nights and heat waves have become more frequent.

*There has been an increase in the intensity of tropical cyclones in the North Atlantic since about 1970 as well as in some other regions. "It is very likely that hot extremes, hot nights and heat waves have become more frequent", says the summary.

Doronila goes on to say, "Far from being alarmist, the report is couched in careful scientific language that is criticized by some quarters as too conservative and an understatement of the panel's case."

A similar report was issued by the Environmental Protection Agency in 2002, but President George W. Bush dismissed his own EPA's advice as a "report put out by the bureaucracy."

It is alarming, but not surprising--that an administration as in bed with the oil and gas industry as the Bush administration is-- continues to fiddle, despite the wealth of scientific evidence indicating the current level of burning fossil fuels is disastrous to the world.

The Bush administration has also refused to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, which was opened for signature in 1997 in Kyoto, Japan.  The protocol is an amendment to the international treaty on climate change, assigning mandatory targets for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions to signatory nations. It was entered into force on February 15, 2005. 

The United States has signed the protocol, but not ratified it, which means it is not enforceable in the United States.  

China, the world's second largest contributor to greenhouse gases-- second only behind the United States--has also resisted the requirements of Kyoto.  It is predicted that China will pass the United States as the largest emitter of greenhouse gases in a few years.

 Because India is still classified as a developing country, it has been exempted from the requirements, though India did sign and ratify it. But India is a significant and growing contributor to global warming.

Russia did sign and ratify Kyoto, but has so far not supported the new IPCC report.

Another large contributor to greenhouse gases is Australia.  But Australia, like the United States, has signed Kyoto but refuses to ratify it.

The European Union supports the IPCC report, and has signed and ratified Kyoto.  In total, 169 countries and other governmental entities had signed the Kyoto protocol as of December, 2006.

As the world burns, the United States, China and others continue to bury their head in the sand; primarily out of fear of losing industrial competitiveness to countries who have not ratified Kyoto, or who are not otherwise limited by the protocol.

It is a sad situation when lining the pockets of industrial barons today--whether here, or in China, Russia, India, Australia or anywhere--is valued above saving the Earth for future generations. 

You would think that people who are supposedly intelligent enough to lead their nations could hear the loud and clear message from the scientific world, which says:  "Our planet is burning, and you are lighting the fires."

But then, the fiddles are playing loudly in the palaces of the powerful, both here and around the globe.

View Article  Attention President Bush: Lousy Is the Wrong Word for Iraq War

Elizabethtown, KY-January 18, 2007

 This past Tuesday, President George W. Bush told a PBS interviewer that "No question, 2006 was a lousy year for Iraq." 

Mr. President:  With all due respect, the word "lousy" is both inadequate and disingenuous.  But then, with your record of being disingenuous, what should we expect?  When it comes to the Iraq War, you are incapable of truthfulness about it; whether before, during--and I am sure-- after the war has been concluded.

"Lousy" implies "unpleasant" or "disappointing".  But Iraq in 2006 was much more than that.  It was tragic. It was tragic because it involved--as every year of this war has so far--unnecessary death, grief, displacement, and destruction.

In 2006, 824 more of our servicemen lost their lives in Your War. That is over 27% of the lives our military have lost so far, a total of 3024 through 2006.  Connected to each of these lives that was destroyed is a family in grief.  Many of these are wives, husbands, and children.  Others are mothers, fathers, brothers, and sisters. For each of them, the loss of their loved one was more than "lousy", Sir.  It was tragic.

6,372 U.S. servicemen were wounded in 2006, Mr. President.    That is the second highest total of any year in Your War so far.  It is also 7% higher than in 2005.  To date over 22,000 of our troops have been wounded in Your War.  How many of these have lost limbs, eyes, ears, physical capabilities, or enduring mental complications? These are tragedies, Mr. President.

According to a recent U.N. report, Mr. President, almost 35,000 Iraqis lost their lives in Your War in 2006.  Their deaths are as tragic to their families as ours are to us. Hundreds of thousands more have fled their homes and their country due to the sectarian violence Your Tragic War unleashed.

So, Mr. President, while any kind of admission of failure by you is a new and welcome event, I would ask you to stop trying to minimize the death, suffering, and displacement you have caused by involving this country, our coalition partners, and the Iraqis themselves in Your Tragic Mistake.

A bad round of golf is lousy.  A bad hand of cards is lousy. A nasty cold is lousy. 

The unnecessary deaths of hundreds of thousands of people,  the unnecessary physical damage done to hundreds of thousands of bodies, and the unnecessary displacement of hundreds of thousands of people from their homes and their country is not just lousy.

It's tragic, Mr. President.  Tragic.

 

View Article  McCain Has Moral Authority on Interrogation--Bush Does Not

Republican Senator John McCain is at odds with President George W. Bush's desire to avoid the Geneva Conventions, particularly Article 3 dealing with inhumane treatment of prisoners.

As most know, Senator McCain spent a long internment in a Viet- Kong prisoner camp, enduring harsh treatment.  He therefore has the moral standing to speak authoritatively on this issue.

On the other hand, George ...   more »

View Article  Bush's Sad and Desperate Attempt to Link Iraq and Terror

Last night, President George W. Bush displayed the sad desperation with which his administration is saddled.

Faced with a majority of Americans that do not approve of the Iraq war--especially the conduct of it--Bush tried desperately to combine the "war on terror" and the war in Iraq in the public's mind.  At the same time, he made a thinly-veiled attempt to ...   more »

View Article  Arms sales--the Scourge of the World

Much has been made of the roles of Syria and Iran in arming and financing Hezbollah's army. And make no bones about it, it is an army.  Its methods are unconventional, but many of its weapons are not.

Which brings us to the source of the weapons. Yes, the weapons are coming from Iran through Syria.  But how does Iran ...   more »